This hunt targets adversaries leveraging the BlackShades RAT framework to establish persistent command-and-control channels within Azure workloads via signature-based detection. Proactively hunting for this specific YARA rule is critical because early identification of BlackShades activity allows the SOC team to isolate compromised endpoints before lateral movement or data exfiltration occurs, despite its current low severity classification.
rule BlackShades_25052015
{
meta:
author = "Brian Wallace (@botnet_hunter)"
date = "2014/04"
ref = "http://malwareconfig.com/stats/PoisonIvy"
ref = "http://blog.cylance.com/a-study-in-bots-blackshades-net"
family = "blackshades"
strings:
$string1 = "bss_server"
$string2 = "txtChat"
$string3 = "UDPFlood"
condition:
all of them
}
This YARA rule can be deployed in the following contexts:
This rule contains 3 string patterns in its detection logic.
Here are 4 specific false positive scenarios for the BlackShades 25052015 detection rule in an enterprise environment, along with suggested filters:
Endpoint Protection Policy Deployment via SCCM/Intune
%TEMP% directories and modifying HKLM\Software\Policies registry paths to enforce compliance settings, mimicking the initial infection behavior of BlackShades.ccmexec.exe (SCCM) or Microsoft.Ingestion.Agent.exe (Intune), specifically when the target path contains \CCMCache\ or \WindowsApps\.Automated Certificate Renewal by DigiCert/GlobalSign Agents
.pfx or .cer files to secure directories and update certificate stores, triggering the YARA rule’s logic regarding file system modifications and network handshake patterns associated with the malware.DigiCertAgent.exe, VenafiService.exe) and whitelist specific registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\DigiCert or `HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\CertSvc